Publius Project
Essays & conversations about constitutional moments on the Net collected by the Berkman Center.

About the Publius Project

This collection will highlight asynchronous moments occurring in high profile settings and at the edges of cyberspace that link to formulate the norms and realities of decision-making on the web. Through this series of essays, we hope to generate a discussion among global stakeholders and netizens regarding rule-making and governance on the net, and in the process, to envision the net of the future. We will cast fundamental questions that will intrigue both experts and laypeople, by asking who should (or shouldn’t) control cyberspace? Can it be governed? Who decides?

Through this process, we will consider how best to protect our common resources, how to balance individual freedoms with community rights, public action with private activity, national security with personal expression, intellectual property protections with open access. In echoing historical dilemmas, we will ask how cyberspace stimulates innovative thinking regarding authority and rules and how those ideas might shape the future “constitutions” of the net. It will be a thought-provoking and illuminating journey, and we very much hope that you will join us.

The Publius Project was developed with the generous support of the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation.

A Singular Constitutional Moment


Since the early frontier days of the Internet, the question of how the medium should be controlled and by whom, has been hotly debated. Yet the governance questions that characterized the early 1990s—“How will baseline rules of conduct that facilitate reliable communications and trustworthy commerce be established? Who will define, punish and prevent wrongful actions that trash the electronic commons or impose harm unjustifiably on others?”—predicted a decisive constitutional moment that never arose. While Post and others argued that a controlling body would emerge as a powerful “governing entity with ultimate authority over this…global resource”, we realized later that net rules would instead evolve organically, through many different actors across time and place.

Ten years later, those prescient questions remain, while daily decisions taken by diverse parties around the world are determining what sort of Internet we will have. By engaging in these debates now, we can still impact the outcomes: “(w)e are entering a time when our power to muck about with these structures that regulate is at an all-time high. It is imperative, then, that we understand just what to do with this power. And more important, what not to do.”

The Publius platform will bring these issues to the public in meaningful and relevant ways, all the while asking how traditional understandings of regulation, control and governance are manifest and constructed anew in cyberspace. Working from the premise that there are constitution-making moments occurring in quiet corners of the net all the time, we are asking the denizens of this space (and some outside of it) to describe the most significant of these moments, and what they are likely to be in the future. While the rapid pace of technological, business, and policy change may suggest that such moments are evanescent, we believe that the collection of these essays will shine light on the still-fresh online constitutional issues, particularly those related to control, human rights, identity, property, community, and democracy, that will engage us long into the future.